Pernicious City: Mythologization of Kaunas in the Lithuanian Literature of the Interwar Period

2018, 62, No. 4

Viktorija Šeina

Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore, Vilnius

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.2633

Publication date

24.05.2019

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

arts and humanities

Discipline

philosophy, history, archeology, linguistics, literary studies, culture and religion studies, arts studies, polish studies

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 274 KB

Article

Number of views:103

Number of downloads:4

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The article analyzes the mythologization of Kaunas, the temporary capital of Lithuania, in the Lithuanian literature of the interwar period. The methodological approach of the research is based on the research methods of urban mythopoetics by Vladimir Toporov and that of topological semiotics by Algirdas Julien Greimas. Due to objective historical and social circumstances, the formation of the Lithuanian urban literature started only at the beginning of the 20th century. The intensive period in the urbanization of the Lithuanian literature was that of the interwar period when literary reflections on Kaunas started gaining certain dominant symbolic images of the city, repeating plots and characters typical of Kaunas. The literary myth of the temporary capital as a pernicious city which becomes a moral trial for an individual is revealed in the article through the analysis of Part III of the novel Altorių šešėly [In the shadows of altars] by Vincas Mykolaitis-Putinas, the most prominent Lithuanian novelist of the interwar period.

Keywords:

Bibliography

вЂњAЕЎ, LuДЌinskas, вЂ“ benderdarbis.вЂќ In GiesmД— muЕѕikД—lio (IЕЎ XVIвЂ“XIX a. anoniminД—s lietuviЕі poezijos), 37вЂ“8. Vilnius: Vaga, 1982.

Bakonis, Evaldas. “Laikinoji sostinė.” In Lietuvos istorija: iliustruota enciklopedija, 256–61. Kaunas: Šviesa, 2012.

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. “Pour une sémiotique topologique.” In idem, Sémiotique et sciences sociales, 129–57. Paris: Le Seuil, 1976.

KrukauskienД—, Eugenija, ed. MiestieДЌiai: vilnieДЌiЕі ir kaunieДЌiЕі tapatumo, savivokos ir poЕѕiЕ«riЕі sociologinД— analizД—. Vilnius: Lietuvos filosofijos ir sociologijos institutas, 1997.

Lukács, Georg. Ausgewählte Schriften. Vol. 1: Die Grablegung des alten Deutschland. Essays zur deutschen Literatur des 19. Jahrhunderts. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt – Taschenbuch – Verlag, 1970.

Mykolaitis-Putinas, Vincas. RaЕЎtai. Vol. 4: AltoriЕі ЕЎeЕЎД—ly. Vilnius: Vaga, 1992.

Simmel, Georg. “Groβstädte und das Geistesleben.” In idem, Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901–1908, Vol. 1, edited by Rüdiger Kramme, Angela Rammstedt, Otthein Rammstedt, 116–31. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2001.

Иванов, Вячеслав. “К семиотическому изучению культурной истории большого города.” In idem, Избранные труды по семиотике и истории культуры, Vol. 4: Семиотика культуры, искусства, науки, 165–79. Москва: Языки русской культуры, 2007.

Топоров, Владимир Н. Миф. Ритуал. Символ. Образ: Исследования в области мифопоэтического: Избранное. Москва: Прогресс, 1995.

Топоров, Владимир Н. “Петербург и Петербургский текст русской литературы.” In idem, Петербургский текст русской литературы: Избранные труды, 7–118. Санкт-Петербург: Искусство-СПБ, 2003.

Топоров, Владимир Н. “Пространство и текст.” In Текст: семантика и структура, 227–84. Москва: Наука, 1983.