2016, 60, No. 1
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 184 KB
Number of views:165
Number of downloads:39
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
Due to extreme discrepancies in comprehension of the literary myth, many modern literary scholars consider it as a very broad concept which may be used for any occasion to define any research subject. The myth is often identified with an archetype, a theme or a motif, which leads to misunderstandings. The author of this study proposes to apply a term of the literary myth only to stories about certain events, retold in various works, whose heroes are particular people or beings with human features. This “minimum” definition of the literary myth, which does not take into account the characteristics and functions that are usually attributed to the myth, and which at the same time allows to distinguish it from other concepts used in literary studies, may be a starting point for studies of various kinds and is intended by the author to facilitate the theoretical discussion on the myths in literature.
Other articles from the issue
- -
Spis treści/Contents
- -
Między reprezentacją a symulakrum, czyli o newsach w różnych mediach, miejscach i czasie – wprowadzenie
Ewa Szczęsna
- newsinformacjanadawcaodbiorcaprawdadoświadczeniewyobraźniaśrodki przekazupodejście autorskiedialogspotkanieantropologiakultura mediówpoetykalingwistykajęzyk newsówafazja informacyjna
Antropologia newsów
Marek Hendrykowski
