Obecność idei Piotra Czaadajewa w dyskursie o człowieku Aleksandra Hercena
2016, 60, No. 2
Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Wydział Humanistyczny
DOI
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 220 KB
Number of views:183
Number of downloads:21
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
In the article I discuss the influence of Pyotr Chaadayev’s thoughts contained in the first Philosophical Letter on Alexander Herzen’s concept. Chaadayev was openly intriguing, as despite general societal silence he spoke out against the Russian state oppressing an individual. I pay attention to the fact that Herzen’s attempt to defend an individual appropriated by abstraction (the state, God, ideology, progress) stems from the sources of Chaadayev’s concepts. Herzen revalues Chaadayev’s idea of Russia free from the burden of history, shifting the focus from historiography to philosophical anthropology. Each individual becomes part of it, as originally we are all deprived of history, its burden, every man thrown into the world is not ready, undefined, the past does not exist for him, just as the presence exists and the future opens potentially with multiple variants.
Keywords:
Other articles from the issue
Similar publications
28.02.2025
CnotliwiThe VirtuousEliza Orzeszkowareceptionreligionvirtueintertextual dialogueintertextualitysymbolinterpretative keycontext fieldWokół "Cnotliwych" Elizy Orzeszkowej. Klucze doczytań i pola kontekstowe
Dawid Maria Osiński
11.10.2023
religionwomen writersreligious communityChurchEnglish literatureW poszukiwaniu wspólnoty. Eliza Orzeszkowa w kręgu pytań pisarek angielskich XIX wieku
Ewa Paczoska
11.10.2023
emancipationhistory of feminismChurchChristianityreligion„Największym pariasem rodu ludzkiego jest kobieta chrześcijanka” (?) Kościół i religia w dyskursie emancypacyjnym
Magdalena Sadlik
